Os perigos do eco-fundamentalismo nas democracias...Análise & reflexão política

Nota prévia do Macro: Três perigos para as democracias:

1. Retórica perigosa e provocante

2. Movimento de salvação global

3. Eco-fundamentalismo

• Quem pensou que o termo da Guerra Fria resolvia a conflitualidade do passado pelo anúncio automático de que a tese do fim da História arrumaria vencedores e vencidos nas prateleiras da História - enganou-se tremendamente. O velho inimigo comunista desagregou-se hoje em mútiplos inimigos, e alguns por serem invisíveis ou de difícil indentificação (como os terrorismos erráticos com vocação catastrófica e suicidária) - vêem acumular ainda mais as conflitualidades no seio das sociedades. Introduzindo-lhes uma largura, uma espessura e um tempo cronológico de decisão que "rebentou" com o campo de possibilidades anterior, e com os quais estávamos todos habituados a lidar.
  É aqui que se agrava o terreno da conflitualidade estratégica entre dois tipos de sociedades: a) as sociedades tradicionais, viradas para o passado e avessas à modernidade, reproduzindo velhos hábitos e códigos; b) e as sociedades com potencial de modernização, com vitalidade e com vontade de mudança. O choque daquela troika de perigos atravessa estes dois potenciais de atraso (por um lado) e de modernização (por outro). É isto que explica por que razão em certas sociedades existe um clima de decadência e de baixa atractividade para a mudança; e noutras existem dinâmicas atractivas para que a globalização competitiva se converta em globalização feliz.

  ********************************************************

"The New Religion of Eco-Fundamentalism?

By The Globalist Friday, December 01, 2006

For all masters of rhetoric, we present a riddle this week: Can you cover the subjects of anti-Americanism, hostility to capitalism, green protectionism, anti-poverty, Islamic fundamentalism and blasphemy — and string them together in one 220-word argument against climate change? In this Globalist Document, we present how it is done. And at the end, we also reveal the estimable author's identity.

How — or even whether — governments should work to control their countries' greenhouse gas emissions has become one of the most contentious public policy issues of the day. They do not suffer a lack of advice. Passionate environmentalists, including scientists, policymakers and well-organized advocacy groups, have proposed a long list of regulations and penalties. But what is frequently overlooked is that this new religion of "eco-fundamentalism" can present at least three dangers of its own:

1. Dangerous rhetoric "The first is that the governments of Europe, fired in many cases by anti-Americanism — never underestimate the extent to which distaste for President Bush has fuelled the anti-global warming movement — may get so carried away by their rhetoric as to impose measures which do serious harm to their economies."

2. Global salvationist movement

"The second, and more fundamental, danger is that the global salvationist movement is profoundly hostile to capitalism and the market economy. There are already increasing calls for green protectionism — for the imposition of trade restrictions against those countries which fail to agree to curb their carbon dioxide emissions. Given the fact that the only way in which the world’s poor will ever be able to escape from their poverty is by embracing capitalism and the global market economy, this is not good news."

3. Eco-fundamentalism "But the third danger is even more profound. Today, we are very conscious of the threat we face from the supreme intolerance of Islamic fundamentalism. It could not be a worse time to abandon our own traditions of reason and tolerance, and to embrace instead the irrationality and intolerance of eco-fundamentalism, where reasoned questioning of its mantras is regarded as a form of blasphemy. There is no greater threat to the people of this planet than the retreat from reason we see all around us today." And the author is ... Nigel Lawson Nigel Lawson served as the Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1983 to 1989 under British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. In 2005, Mr. Lawson co-signed a letter published in London's Times newspaper that voiced skepticism about the science invoked by the environmental movement on climate change. On November 1, 2006, he delivered a lecture at the Centre for Policy Studies, entitled "The Economics and Politics of Climate Change: An Appeal to Reason," in which he criticizes the British government's Stern Report on the economic impacts of global warming. The lecture — from which the above passages were quoted — makes alternative proposals for how climate change can be managed without adverse economic consequences."